VR Oxygen was formed to study people and the way they use virtual reality, their mental models, needs, and desires; to find, validate and solve the problems they face with this new medium. As well as to explore the process of creating a VR experience and to analyze various VR products and tools, to work towards the enhancement of virtual reality experiences through tests and iterations, to discover and work on the VR product that people will be delighted with.
Described below: VR design process, VR viewer, video blog, product website.
Designing for virtual reality included surveys and tests to determine the type of experience to work on, and a thorough research of tools, products, and all the criteria to be considered in order to have a comfortable and delightful VR experience with the scalable number of players.
After establishing and exploring the components needed to create an MVP, I concentrated on VR interactions as a next and current step. That includes a lot of testing and iterations, as well as learning new tools and processes.
Based on the research, when the target audience with its needs and interests was found, I surveyed 19 people and conducted 15 interviews and found out that most of the people from TA were interested in an experience where they could have a maximum agency, build, create and even improvise with all sort of things, being interested in multiplayer games with social aspect. Most people didn’t emphasize a particular theme or genre but leaned more towards a possible agency and impact they could make. Below is one of the surveys.
What type of Virtual Reality content would interest you, if at all?
The main findings: All of it, Games, Building and creating VR, Visiting different places (real or fictional)
The main design process stayed the same since it’s very flexible and can be applied to almost any type of product and industry. The workflow was changed and adjusted adding more tests and rapid prototyping, storyboarding-prototyping were synchronized to be able to test each iteration in VR.
When creating a VR experience it’s important to understand why to select this type of media – the value of producing a product as an immersive VR experience rather than using any other platform should be obvious.
In the case of the type of experience that the majority of people leaned to – multiplayer games with social aspect – it’s the possibility to virtually communicate with people who are far away, to feel united with people through activities made together, such as building worlds and environments, sharing these environments, to feel physically present in a virtual space for the matter of visit or entertainment sake.
People ages 13-17 willing to play and share their games privately in virtual worlds, build and create in a safe enironmanet, learn VR tools and techniques.
Young adults 18-39 who'd like to unite with their friends and family and to explore the creativity of VR worlds.
Personal: Few or no VR design best practices, no workflow or established VR guidelines and rules that are fully proved to be successful.
People: Being far away people can’t really be together or share the same room, have a spatial influence through co-creation and interaction within the same place.
Continue identifying people's needs in VR experience in more details, create it.
Research and develop a VR design process, explore VR tools and select the most efficient ones, create and test different VR solutions.
Easy access to close friends and family, significant others, virtual presence and interactions at any distance.
Education and creativity boost
Possibility to earn money inside of thes virtual worlds for creating valuable content
Possibility to meet new people in a safe environment.
Strenghtening brand authority and trust.
Continuous players' feedback helping to create better products.
Measurement of Success (for the near future, as it will change at the next level)
Positive feedback and growing user base.
Clear identification of the product to build, feature or other value to create.
Active feedback and engagement.
The next step was to determine which specific type of experience to develop. Based on the desire of TA to be able to build and create inside of the experience, have a full agency, and treating the whole process as an experiment and a opportunity to learn, I started working on a experience that was inspired by Social Platforms like Facebook, games like Minecraft, and 3D models websites and stores like Unity Asset Store.
People have their mental models and expectations which I was testing and validating, that's, why I decided to start building what people say or express they want, though they may not be sure of their own desires conserning VR or feel that they are irrelevant, or have assumptions of what they think they should do if in VR etc.
So I took it as a starting point, but decided to add and modify the environment creating a hypothesis that people might like it (for example, many new devices and features no one knew or thought about initially are now widely used and loved, of course it all was based on people's needs, problems, and motivations, which should be constantly being explored), then test to confirm or decline this hypothesis, counting both in this case as a win of gaining more knowledge about people and VR.
Selecting the right platform was as well a priority, especially ath the beginning stage, leaving the possibility to optimize across other devices and formats in the future.
At the beginning I chose Oculus as a platform, based on the opportunity to have a better quality in the near future (it was DK2 time).
Later on the way I switched to mobile VR based on the following aspects:
Based on the research showing that the number of mobile devices is huge and growing and the VR HMD adoption is still at a starting point due to some tech constraints and price.
Mobile VR audience is hypothetically large and the locations are widely dispersed, so the accessibility is not an issue, as well as price and simplicity in use.
The product that was created along the way and had an obvious interest among people (Cardboard VR Viewer).
The VR HMD and mobile device portability – freedom of where and how people could experience it.
Research the existing VR tools and processes, findings, existing materials and whitepapers.
Research Users, define Use Cases and map a User Journey
Define the User Flow, create a Storyboard and a rough VR prototype to test the comfort zones, scale and interactions with TA.
Research Fiber Internet and estimated requirements for VR, Distributed Networks, Security and Encryption, Smart contracts, Cryptocurrency Market and dependencies.
More detailed VR prototype, test, iterate and repeat, PoC
Hi-fi prototype, MVP and Product/market fit, launch to test
Research analytics (Unity and other) to be able to measure performance:
Track the device type
Measure selected elements in the experience
Understand better who are the people that use this experience; their location
Discover the most viewed areas of the experience
Measure player engagement, where did people look at, how frequent they change position and use the interaction methods (Unity analytics has introduced Heatmaps to visualize the spatial events). New update: YouTube announced Heatmap Analytics. In this case, it might be useful to publish some VR scenes on YouTube to receive more statistics.
Know the performance of the content accross platforms
Observation (combined results for 2015 VR events and 2016 expos with VR Oxygen as an exhibitor).
During expos and VR events I took the time to observe and interview people. I usually selected 10 participants to take notes about and showed them 2-3 VR experiences with different interaction methods and environments. First of all, I wanted to know what would be the behaviour of a New User if given a VR demo.
I as well watched people trying VR at various events: specifically, the First Time Users trying VR headsets and experiences, their reactions and behaviours, body language, expressions, often I was also able to ask them some questions in an informal chat after their experience. These tests were very casual, more as a chat/ conversation, never mentioning that I work on VR but "being a newbie", which definitely helped to gather more honest information, as well as gave me an entertaining feeling of being a secret VR agent.
Being an organizer of a big VR expo (SFVR) also helped me in gathering feedback from people and conducting observations, as well as gave me an opportunity to view and test a huge amount of very different VR experiences, tools and devices.
Among the interesting findings were:
People, when placed into VR, don’t turn around or look around for cues, they just look in front of them and wait being not aware they can move 360°, people don’t look up or down, usually ignoring the sound cues as well and not moving much even after being told they can move around, they move carefully and slowly. (10 of 10, ages 18-39, New Users)
People got bored quickly if they weren’t engaged within the first 5-7 seconds and didn’t want to continue, put down the headset (8 of 10, all ages, New Users)
Younger people were usually much more active in VR and after a short period of time were able to figure out what to do and how to interact but at the very beginning often just waited for cues to appear right in front of them (7 of 10, ages 10-17, New Users)
Most People don’t have a clear understanding of how the good VR experience sould look like and feel, or have a very limited or negative (dissapointing, low-quality) VR experience. (My research and observations conducted later along the way confirmed this assumption greatly – VR Viewer: New Users and Experienced Users test
Hypothesis: Creating clear visual cues at the very beginning and positioning the UI and important elements in the FOV of the viewer will explain players they can interact with the environment (FOV at the time of joining VR – in front of the person => don't confuse with attach to FOV – it should never be done!).
An experience could have an short onboarding, if applicable, which would feel like a part or level of the experience using all the interactions and cues as a scaffolding guide. Another way to introduce people to the new elements: in a timely manner along the way to avoid possible cognititve load.
To do: Get people to understand that they can move around, and get them to understand it within the first 5 seconds, otherwise they would be confused why nothing happens.
Some of the participants assumed they could perform any gestures: People waved and made other hand movements (4 of 10, ages 10-17, New Users)
Younger People after encountering that they could move in VR tried to manipulate all the objects that were present in the environment (6 of 10, ages 10-17, New Users)
Younger People were afraid of complete darkness in VR, which could affect the navigation performance, but still liked the experience (3 of 10, ages 13 and below, New Users).
People’s arms got tired from holding Cardboard VR viewer when stayed for a prolonged time in VR, even though they really liked playing a game or viewing an experience. (all ages, mostly people ages 28-39)
An observation of people playing in Oculus and Vive as well showed that even having a headset tied to head, their arms still got tired from holding controllers. Because in RR we don’t make such interactions with hands, don't hold our hand up for a prolonged period of time, so having arms all the time interacting with something could be naturally tiring, especially if hands should be held up. From my findings, the gaze-based interaction is one of the most simple and efficient now.
I am sure that the hardware and software will evolve much during a relatively short timeframe, but I found it right to start creating within the current constraints.
Probably VR will be adaptive – optimized (downgraded/ upgraded) for different devices, inputs and outputs (controller, button), have a cross-platform support.
Searching and going through more than 20 mobile VR apps every week for several months and time spent as an SFVR organizer helped me to develop an eye for what is good for VR, what works and what doesn’t. Observations and tests continued to help me with evaluations and assumptions. It was easier to understand wishes and needs of the players, their reactions to the experience.
I started working on the product that has a strong social aspect keeping in mind that it will change greatly over the course of the development, treating it as VR exploration.
The experience was started with the environment based on my research, which revealed people enjoyed building and creating, showing their builds to others. The avatar creation was postponed to the next stage of development due to some technical constraints, selecting it as a second stage in the project, but not underrating the importance of it. Assuming that seeing the reaction of other people would be very important for players, same as possibly trying to establish some connection in VR.
The working title was selected as “Doors”. Various names were considered and to see what people think about them I conducted short interviews where I asked what assosiations do they have from the selected words including Doors. Doors was selected as the best and most close to the intended meaning (a place where everyone can create anything you want, a world where people could express themselves, gain the new possibilities, a new way). The name is a working title, which is planned to be tested again along the way and may be changed.
Based on the research and qualitative data, the following Personas were discovered: World Changer as a Primary Persona, VR Enthusiast and VR Explorer as Secondary Personas. More of the Persona creation process is here.
To better understand the experience functionality, how it would work and to brainstorm it once again in all the details, I started working on use cases. An example is below:
Use case 1. Visiting a friend and creating a world together as an entertaining experience
Player – Alex (World Changer)
Preconditions: Alex is home and has some free time to relax and have fun.
Trigger: Alex got a VR headset a while ago and watched online videos presenting a VR network where players can build worlds and even earn some money.
1. Player enters is in VR wearing their HMD.
2. A VR Standalone HMD delivers a splash screen of the experience with the choice to proceed
3. Player pushes the fuse button; The fuse button shows the timer and after a wait time the system proceeds to the experience
The flow would be assisted with cues, there are two main directions in this experience: creating player's private world and exploring, browsing the outer world. I started with the draft of main interations, which I am adjusting and elaborating along the way. Here is the flow I started with:
To visualize and document the full end-to-end experience including the emotional part, I started working on User Journey Map. In this draft I mapped motivations, actions, interactions, touchpoints, emotions and feelings, possible failures.
Next step was to start sketching a storyboard. Since it's a 360° VR experience, I created spherical views based onthe user flow. I also learnt about the specific degrees of comfortable viewing and with a very rough approximation was incorporating them into the storyboard.
Spherical Storyboarding was used to roughly visualize the user flow, decide what should be in front of the player, to the sides and behind. It was clear that Spherical Storyboarding style isn't appropriate for further and more detailed Scene Sketching and Rapid Prototyping (to be able to test the scenes in VR) but it's great for a starting point. Currently I use Spherical Storyboarding to quickly draft the flow and decide what should be in the scene – something similar to blocking and staging for a play or film, but adjusted to VR.
Next, I switched back to the traditional way of storyboarding with minor changes such as drawign some details beyound the frame. In real life we don’t see all 360° view simultaneously, neither focus on 180° view, but we have a focal point and our side vision is blurred, we can approximately tell what’s happening on the left and right, but not in detailes unless we turn and focus on it – changing the focal point. Based on this observation I started drawing Focal Point Storyboards which then resulted in switching to cubemaps. Cubemaps are convenient to sketch and are perfect at this stage, because they create a full 360° view to check the scenes in VR, unlike all the previous types of storyboards.
Before settling for cubemaps, I went through various tools to find the best one for Scene Sketching and Prorotyping, among the tools were: GoPro VR Player where I could upload the equirectangular images, A-Frame where I could view a sandbox in VR, Krpano Panorama Viewer and other tools were explored while looking for the best solution. I also tried different layouts but almost all included equirectangular images, different types of panoramas, which due to the perspectives were unnatural to sketch.
The importance to test the experience in VR is essential, because it always feels very different from screen and viewing in VR, especially the scale and the UI placement. I decided to create very rough small prototypes to confirm the scenes: comfort zones, location and scale. I used cubemaps not only for full scenes, but to quickly preview the objects and UI elements in 3D, their scale and depth, sometimes combining parts of several scenes in one cubemap. Cubemap is a good way to test the VR storyboard and to immediately make iterations, then check these changes again in VR.
Based on the findings from my research I concluded that all the objects inside of the experience should be interactive and useful or not be present at all, behaviours – easy to understand and recognize, the design should be clean and minimal, comfortable for eyes and mind, not overwhelming.
Everything in VR should feel real, but not in the meaning of being similar to the RR wolrd, but in the meaning of feeling the presence and probability to interact with the virtual world. Also, consistency plays one of the main roles to help the new users in learning the VR interactions and environments, and in being able to predict players' behaviours, to meet their expectations. Naturally, people anticipate consistency, which is clearly shown in Gestalt phycology and is used in traditional design.
I decided to start with adding some of the familiar objects like doors to support people’s mental models, some of the instinctive and intuitive affordances from RR. But encourage to create literally any environment. I also started thinking about the possible sound cues.
I chose cubemaps over equirectangualar images and cylindrical panoramas because of its simplicity in terms of sketching – no need to draw in perspective, and a higher precision – it’s full 360°, when pamoramas are 360° x 180°. Of course, there are tools to convert cubemaps to equirectangualar images and vice versa, but what I found very convenient in cubemaps is that the cubes (sides) borders help to feel the size of FOV better.
At the moment, the most used template for me is a 6-sided skybox made from cubemap.
I tried column and row cubemaps and settled on horizontal cross layout, because this template is very natural for drawing 360° view. Later, I started drawing each view (each cube) separately, which can be timesaving when using the 6-sided sandbox in Unity, specifically if testing seperate objects or UI. To view the cubemap in VR I create a skybox in Unity and make a build for Android or iPhone to test in Cardboard VR Viewer. It’s a quick and convenient way to sketch fast, test and iterate immediately, test again and so on until it’s ready for the next step. And once built, it’s a fast way to check the other scenes in VR within the same file.
Below are some of my first sketches for VR. They were too big, but I could immediately establish and document the confort zones right on the sketches.
In order to keep the size and proportions, I created a cubemap layout, then printed it out and kept sketching.
My first drawings were too big in scale and too close to the player, as well as were some issues with comfort zones.
I documented these issues immediately while looking into the scene in VR and fixed them, so the next drawings kept getting more and more comfortable in VR.
Below are some scene and cubemap examples. I use this method to test scale and depth of particular objects and to understand the comfortable and suitable level of details for VR. If colored, it also helps to identify the comfortable color palette for the experience.
After some time of storyboarding, between sperical prototyping and cubemapping, I started exploring the components needed to create this VR experience. I looked into:
Fiber Internet and estimated requirements for VR, Servers, Distributed Networks, Security and Privacy, Self-Encryption, Smart contracts, Cryptocurrency Market research and dependencies.
To establish technical feasibility of the product, I analyzed server/ hosting types and costs.
The following would be included:
Login (authentication) server
World/ Room servers
Group/ Meeting servers
Servers and Hosting costs
When researching about the server I considered:
A number of players in total
A number of players active at any given time
A number of players on at peak
The distance between players, locations
I kept in mind that it should be scalable – to support a growing playerbase. The price could be the main concern.
I looked into cloud servers to compare Cloud Server and Dedicated Server. The cost and security concern can be present.
I explored fiber optic internet to have an understanding about the fiber technology and to find solution to increase bandwidth greatly. This type of low-latency and fast internet could work, but one of the major constraints kept being the high cost, if not take privacy and security which are about the same with previous solutions.
Security must be at the high level in the experience, based on TA needs and requirements.
Thinking about the ways to minimize the cost and performance of internet and to make all operations secure and private, I spent significant amount of time exploring possible solutions such as distributed networks that utilize P2P technology and work on creating a decentralized distributed internet without relying on blockchain, which is important for comfortable experience and user base scalability.
After an extensive research and several interviews, I concluded that blockchain technology can not be utilized by VR yet (at least, not at the moment) since people would need to set up, store/ retrieve data – perform all the possible operations in VR world instantaneously, and blockchain consensus algorithm is inefficient in terms of speed, which is unacceptable in VR. An effort to increase the speed may lead to the security issues, which is unacceptable as well. Thus, blockchain has a lot of technical limitations to be considered for VR use, but I keep an eye on this technology and on several projects in perticular in case it changes. Also, monitoring the SegWit (Segregated Witness soft-fork and may be hard-fork) process and related benefits it may provide.
One of the discovered technologies that could be suitable for VR lets a website/ app to automatically speed up when it gets more players, which is opposite to what usually happens to a website or app. And speend and latency matters are essential for a comfortable and immersive VR experience. (the tech. is currently in development)
I also explored cryptocurrencies and their value dependencies on the market, smart contracts, and the process of utilizing crypto assets and coins. I periodically look for the new companies and recommendations concerning this topic to be up to date, ask the crypto community for their feedback and advice.
The decentralized internet is not ready yet, but it's definitely a brilliant idea and I am watching the companies who work to make it happen. And now the most realistic in terms of implementation and technical constraints would be fiber. There are various estimates for different quality VR experiences requirements ranging from 50 Mbps to 600 Mbps for high level VR game but it won't be validated until it can be tested properly with VR multiplayers. The bandwidth also plays an important role in VR MMO.
During my crypto world reasearh I continued my observations at VR expos, and based on the findings I started working on VR Oxygen’s own Cardboard VR Viewer which then was followed by VR Oxygen’s video blog and website redesign.
After working on the described products, I continued my VR research. I created more storyboards, found and tested new templates and tools, and explored mobile 360. I saw the importance to know more about 360 videos as a connecting unit between standard videos/ photos and VR. It can help people to get used to the idea of 360 and be a transitional point to an actual virtual reality. For my study I used an example template by Facebook 360 for Origami Studio and some free videos from Mettle 360/ VR Master Series.
I had several ideas on how to make people engaged with 360 videos. One of my assumptions was that people would love to leave messages to their friends right on 360 videos. It could be either fun notes, an invitation or a memorable place that people want to remind of – there could be various use cases (sharing a video with a joke; with some information about the location; suggestion to visit, sharing memories between people who are far away etc.), some of my brainstorming and mind mapping sketches can be seen below.
My hypothesis was based on the earlier research I made which included Facebook and Snapchat features. It was clear that people like making notes, draw or write something on the photos. And I decided to prototype and test some of my solutions. It is intended to be used within Facebook messaging or feed but could also be used in other messaging or social app. Described below is one of my ideas of possible user engagement with 360 videos.
Other hypotheses I made:
People should be able to turn the sound off to make the 360 video more comfortable if the sound is too loud or unpleasant. This hypothesis was made based on my observations.
The message should have a limited number of characters (55) to keep the messages short and readable. It became prominent after some testing with different lengths and sizes of notes.
Placing the icons that relate to 360 video right above the video (sound control, bubble – message indicator) will help to clarify their belongig to 360 video, be perceived as a local navigation, not global. To avoid the arised confusion it was necessary to clarify the navigation placement.
There should be a possibility to hide all messages inside of 360 video in case the user wants to scroll and view the clean video without any distractions (specifically, if video has several notes, or the note covers something the user wants to see). This statement was made based on my personal impressions and needs to be clarified further to be confirmed or refuted.
When I did some tests showing 360 videos to 4 people and asking to check the video, I saw that people not always scroll, so an indication of the message inside the video was necessary.
As a solution I decided to place the message icon with notifications (the white bubble) on top of 360 video in the botton navigation bar. The bubble differs from Facebook messaging icons to differentiate the global messaging and local messaging inside of 360 content. My hypothesis is – an easily discoverable message icon with notifications should encourage people to engage with the video and scroll to read the note. By clicking on the message notification icon it's easy to discover that theer can be messages insode of the video.
As a first solution, I made the bubble pulsing to indicate that there is a note on 360 video, but later replaced it with the solid white bubble since after testing the puls it was clear that it's less notable on top of the playing 360 video rather than a static image.
The message icon in the navigation is anchored to an actual message (bubble) inside of the video: on tap on the message navigation the video automatically scrolls to the message. When the message enters the screen view, the notification disappears indicating that the note was read. The message can as well be discovered on manual scroll by users. After the message is read the nav bubble stays in the navigation bar to make it easy to access this message again next time by tapping on the message navigation. If there are several messages inside of 360 video, every next tap on the message navigation will send the user to the next note, one after another.
One navigation icon is sound, another is message, the third navigation icon is an eye indicating a visible or hidden state. Clicking on the eye will hide/ show all the messages inside of 360 video.
All the other navigation such as "share", "comment" etc. is left outside of 360 video – on the overlay that can be accessed on tap – as it's shown in the Origami 360 video example by Facebook.
At first, I added text labels to the navigation icons thinking it might help with discoverability, but when tested it on the device with different videos, the text labels were hard to read on the light or white background, even with the black opacity overlay underneath it looked messy and created confusion. Thus, I decided to remove the text labels relying on the fact that most people are familiar with the icons and would recognize sounds and message. An eye icon needs to be tested more to see what the majority of people associate with this icon.
Then I tested the icons against several different video and photo backgrounds with and without text labels, the discoverability without the labels was better, there was no need in trying to read the labels. It is important to consider the motley type of background, because the video usually contains a variety of very different or opposite colors, so I worked on the icons and their positioning to make sure the navigation is recognized and eay to find on a background of any mix of color.
Next, I moved the icons to the left and positioned them vertically under the compass so all the icons were aligned. Having small icons located in different places of the moving video screen (compass – in the right center, navigation on the bottom) prevents them from being discovered immediately.
The new location provided better recognition and clarified that the icons belong to 360 video (are local) and not to the in-app messaging (global messaging). As well, the navigation icons are more visible and easier to find because they are aligned and grouped which is easier for people to perceive. The reaction of participants whom I asked to navigate was immediate.
One of the thoughts was to make a floating action button (FAB) such as in material design that contains all 3 buttons, it would open/ close on tap. The FAB tap area is separated from the video tap area that opens an overlay with global navigation.
To add a note: Long press anywhere on the video where it's desired to locate the bubble-note will call a plus sign to confirm the location, tap on the plus sign to confirm. If you want to add a note to another location – just tap on the other place of the video (the unconfirmed plus sign will disappear in 2 seconds). If confirmed, a bubble pops up form the plus sign, next – type a message (55 signs max.). Push "return" on the phone keyboard. Done.
To read the note: click on the message notification for the message to be scrolled into the screen or just keep scrolling until the message is discovered.
I validated that turning the sound off is useful: some people immediately turned off the sound when noticed the icon, especially often it happened if the sound was intensive.
The idea with notes on 360 videos requires more tests and iterations to see if it's fun for people to write and place a note inside of the video. As planned:
Test the hide/ show button affordance, clarify if it should only hide messages insode of 360 video or hide all the navigation as well (similar to FAB).
Test if the users expect the bubble to pop-up and grow from the middle of the plus sign as it is right now, or if they expect the main content part of the bubble to be located in the selected position (plus sign).
Find out how to better present the onboarding tutorial "How to add a note to 360 video".
Disclaimer: This 360 experiement had a learning purpose, the featured video (credit: Eric Fassbender, Atmosphaeres, Crystal Shower Falls) came with "360 video post-production in After Effects and Premiere Pro, using SkyBox Suite" free course, along with other 360 videos, and was only used for educational purposes. I tried After Effects, Premier and Origami for prototyping, and settled for Origami and After Effects to work on 360 videos. I used the featured video in my Origami prototype because it didn't have any commercial purpose and was only utilized to experiment with navigation and interactions. I was fascinated by its composition and mood, and found it being the best example of varying background that's challenging to work with in terms of navigation.
After the 360 video exploration I went back to work on the VR project.
Based on the new reasearch I made and some business goals and constraints, it was decided to switch from Oculus Rift to Cardboard VR Viewer and to concentrate on interactions in my VR prototypes.
I understood that switching the HMDs will greatly affect the input method. My goal is to explore and test interactions with the minimal OR natural use of hands in order to find the way to make VR more comfortable. VR cardboard viewer is a good tool to tests gaze-based interactions. Some interactions are still intended to be for hands, in the case the experience is adapted for more advanced VR viewer (adaptive VR). The hand interactions are documented to be tested with an advanced VR HMD.
In real life we don’t interact with the environment the way we often have to in VR, such as actively look around, have hand up for the prolonged period of time to perform tasks etc., which may cause fatigue. The gaze-based interaction could be applicable to any strapped HMD as well, it could limit the "hands up" interactions (or allow to make them short and not too frequent) to avoid hand and neck fatigue. I switched to cardboard keeping in mind that either the phone-based VR will evolve, or, most likely, a new standalone, minimal in size, light, easy to use VR HMD will be available. As well, after some time of cardboard testing, it's planned to go back to more advanced HMDs with controllers like Oculus or Vive to test the documented hand interactions.
To test the VR experience I use VR Oxygen's Cardboard VR Viewer.
It has an obvious and interesting constraint mentioned above – arms get tired holding the viewer.
1. Create a very short but fun experience.
2. Have the headset strapped to the head and create minimal interactions using only gaze and button.
After the storyboard tests I felt comfortable sketching for VR and concentrated on brainstorming, mind mapping and generating ideas. I used some of the techniques from GV Design Sprint and adjusted them to VR, among these techniques were 8 ideas in 5 min (Crazy 8), a storyboard in 5 min and in 20 min. The goal was to generate as many ideas as possible for rooms inside VR, activities, new experiences. I used my storyboard templates and the techniques described above: Spherical Prototyping and Cubemapping. I started with paper sketches and switched to tablet later to draw directly without scanning. It helped to make the texture preparation more time efficient because I didn't have to cut the cubemap into 6 sides.
Doing these tests, I was thinking and looking for that type of virtual world, experience that would be unique for VR, that would be exciting, friendly and social, would help to unite despite distance or some natural life events. And based on my personal experience I came up with several hypotheses, one of which was creating a VR world where the player could get a virtual pet in order to entertain and to solve several problems. To make sure that this idea follows the actual needs and motivations of other people, I used User-Centered Design techniques that included research and interviews.
I successfully validted my hypothesis by talking to at least 19 people about this type of experience, 19 of 19 were very positive about such type of game. As well, the fact that many people love pets, was undeniable with 19 of 19 people stating they like pets. The only difference was that they are different types of pets that people prefer, so it would be preferred if the players could select them. Other aspect that revealed the necessity to create a pet related experience was that not all people who wanted to have a dog, actually could. Some had allergies that kept them away from any pets, others were not able to have a pet due to living conditions not suitable for pet, or pets were not allowed in the house/ apartment, others couldn't afford to care for pet.
One of the other inspirations was Tamagotchi by Bandai – a virtual pet simulation game. It goes through several stages of growth, and will develop differently depending on the care the player provides.
The majority of people like pets, and it was confirmed not only by my online reaserch but also by surveying people of various ages. All people stated that they love pets, varying by type they prefer (some liked all) – dog, cat, Guinea pig, bird etc. The most mentioned pets were dogs and cats. The most loved pet among children was a dog. Adults split between dogs and cats. And the research showed that kids love pets more than adults. The large part of TA for this application consists of young people 10-18 years old, so I selected a dog pet as a first one to work on. To confirm the VR game preference and see if people were honest in the surveys, I conduct tests along the VR development.
I was also considering to have unusual creatures that wouldn't be found in real life but to gradually adapt people to VR using the existing affordances and intuitive behaviours, the dog was selected.
My research included interviews and surveys, as well as online communities research on what people discuss and what they wish to exist in VR. Here are some examples of many discussions I found on Reddit.
The pet preferences slightly differed between reddit communities, school students, and some adults. But all people indicated that they'd like to have some virtual pet creature.
Among my studies was also pet themed VR and non-VR game research. I checked "My Own Pet" on Steam, Oculus' Farlands, Pokémon Go, Neko Atsume: Kitty Collector, Konrad the Kitten, and other.
The reason to create this type of experience is as well connected to my personal experience as a dog lover and owner, which helped me to understand better both, the pets and their owners.
This pet world< is not inteded to replace real pets but to entertain; prepare to have a real pet; teach responsibility, help learning empathy and compassion; give accompany; simulate a pet at the possible extent of current technology (which is being developed along the way) to those who can't have one; and to help with socializing in VR.
Having this initial research I decided to start working on the gameplay, interactions and character, and pivot on the best direction along the way, when the tests will uncover more of people's preferences or hidden motifs.
Below are the details of my story some of the moments of which would most likely be familiar to many of those who has or used to have a dog, or who always wanted to.
I always wanted to have a huge dog like fluffy St. Bernard when I was a child, but living in a big city it wasn't that easy due to many factors:
Limited living space which seemed to be important for a large dog, busy schedule – everyone including myself was permanently out busy with work, schools and various classes, up until the late evening.
Long fur would require more often cleanings, as well as any pet needs attention, care and walks on a regular basis.
As an addition to that, one of my family members was at that time sensitive to some allergens, which all together seemed impossible to have a big pet like dog. But once upon a time, everything changed and we ended up having 2 amazing dogs, the smartest and the best I've ever known. It was an interesting and long story an experience of which helped me in identifying the issues related to pet ownership and in suggesting possible solutions based on people's wishes and values.
Long Story Short
We spent many happy years together with our dogs. They were my best friends who learnt to understand my natural speech, gestures and bahviours (not just commands!), always gave me accompany and made me feel special and loved, which created a special bond that could be only wished to last forever. I graduated from school, started University and was finishing the 3-rd year when the lifechanging event happened – after weeks of everyday treatments and 6 hour-long drop counters the doctors concluded that there is no hope anymore... and so – my beloved dog passed away. Years later we experienced the similar situation with our second dog. Those were heartbreaking events for everyone, which as well led to some conclusions and helped me to form hypotheses which I will pinpoint below.
Children and their parents, young adults.
People with various constraints that prevent them from having a pet (health, living situation, costs (maintenance, care, required shots), absense (e.g. frequent business trips) etc.).
Everyone who needs to have a companion but can't due to the traumatic situations related to pet death or unavoidable illnesses (in some breeds).
Everyone who wants to experience and practice taking care of a pet before getting a real one.
Inability to have a dog due to various difficulties.
Lack of detailed pet related games with a well-thought gameplays suitable for different age groups and tastes.
Inability to have a pet due to the pet death related trauma.
Lack of knowledge and practice when getting a real dog.
Make it possible for everyone to have a pet, dispite any constraints such as health, space, time, costs.
Help people to socialize with other VR participants (VR MMO).
Help people to become better pet-owners by practicing pet care, learning empathy, providing information about the pets for the first-time owners, all hands-on. Let people FEEL being a pet owner before involving themselves into this adventure.
Deliver a fun, educational, and humane entertainment.
Pet care hands-on education
Lifetime companionship that won't stop (if the virtual pet is treated appropriately).
Possibility to esily meet new people in VR, socialize. A way for shy people to establish friendship through pet, VR avatar, and virtual environments.
In-game assets. Distribution and use.
Growing user base
Continuous players' feedback helping to create better products.
Measurement of Success (for the near future, as it changes quickly, same as company goals change. So I regularly revisit them.)
Positive feedback and growing user base.
More precise TA dicovery
Clear identification of the product to build, feature or other value to create.
Active feedback and engagement.
Based on my personal experience and on my talks with people who could possibly use this application, I formed several hypotheses, consolidated below:
The pet experience will help sensitive people to avoid trauma related to pet death which is unevitable in real life.
Replacing death with other suitable event will keep the player focused, but won't traumatize.
People that can't have a pet due to various constraints that are uncompatible with the dog will like the virtual pet experience.
The virtual pet will help lonely people to feel accompanied, it may even help with depression by positive distractions. This definitely needs to be tested and confirmed in the proper environment. The users could include bed-tied patients who want to have a companion that can be present and interacted with anytime.
Having a virtual pet will help teaching responsibility, as well as learning empathy and compassion. I can be a good dog care training before having a real dog, as well.
1. Keep discovering TA through tests and interviews (use events and expos for user engagement).
2. Sketch and storyboard ideas. Define the possible flows.
3. Create small protoypes, test interactions and affordances. Evaluate based on VR heuristics. Iterate.
4. Add 3D (characters and environment), make "grey box" prototypes. Evaluate. Test with new and experienced VR users. Iterate.
5. Add visual design and sound. Evaluate, test and iterate.
Based on the research and qualitative data, I developed the archetypes of people’s behaviors, needs, goals and motivations, problems and mental models.
The discoveries resulted in 3 Personas:
World Changer and New Pet Owner (Primary Personas), Co-Pilot (Secondary Persona). All based on TA and on peviously developed Personas. More of the Persona creation process is here. Personas may change or be updated along the way as a result of my continuous research.
1. Socializing and playing with friends and pets in VR world (VR multiplayer).
2. Enjoying a virtual pet friend as a single player.
3. Practicing pet care skills.
As usual, I mind mapped some of the ideas. I used Sperical Storyboarding to define the user flow and decide on the character and objects' positions in the VR space. I mostly used the GV Sprint techniques adapted for VR. Crazy 8 became Crazy 6 – for quick Scene Storyboarding (Crazy 16 in total, but I only used 6 squares for each full scene) – I folded the paper to create squares imitating cubemaps. Sometimes I also used squares randomly (like Crazy 16) to quickly draw some FOV ideas that could be applied to different scenes.
Use Case #1. Socializing and playing with friends and pets in VR world (left).
Use Case #2. Enjoying a virtual pet friend as a single player (right).
Next, I did some scene sketches using tablet, previewed them in VR to select the directions for further development. Similar to these (scene preview example).
Next prototyping stage is similar to wireframing in UX design – 3D grey boxes as objects with attatched interactions, but no 3D and visual art yet.
After it was decided which ideas to develop and test further, I started working on small 3D prototypes intended to test intractions, locations in 3D space and scale one more time. I also relied on the distances that are considered somfortable for VR, setting them up in Unity3D and immediately testing on my phone.
I kept skyboxes as quick scene drafts, objects' position and scale and color evaluation, and then moved straight to 3D layouting. Below are examples of 3D layouting utilizing grey boxes as objects, and testing solely interactions, positions and scales.
VR Oxygen's video blog that presents selected games was very useful, because while searching for a good VR game or experience to share, I tried different types of locomotion myself and lernt a lot from these games, taking notes of what I have found especially intersting and worth exploring more.
Before working on the prototype I also made a research of interactions in VR, analyzing the research results of some projects that used various VR locomotion techniques. I selected the following to explore: Redirected Walking, Tunneling and Chase Camera, limited movements (short movements without acceleration), dark surrounding area with the focus on the path only, Teleportation, Blur the view/ move/ unblur, another technique was used in a game called Lamper VR: thanks to the narrow corridor people didn't feel sick when playing this game, Cockpit (any device to be used for locomotion).
The experience should be accessible for everyone, I kept in mind some limitations the Redirected Walking will have, and looked for the ways to make a locomotion method selectable.
I also found the Foveated Rendering which is actually the way we look at and process images – focusing on one point and seeing the rest slightly blurry, as well it could help to reduce the rendering workload.
I decided that capitalizing on people's existing knowledge would be the right way to create interactions and introduce people to VR. For example, such games as Inspirit or Gravity Pull VR use Redirected Walking locomotion technique that I've found interesting and when testing these games at an expo, people liked this type of locomotion, finiding it engaging and unusual, and mostly didn't experience side effects or inconveniences when used with breaks. It should be used sparingly to avoid the feeling of disorientation and nausea, if walking in circles (in RR).
VR Oxygen's video blog accumulated a research that was conducted with both, Cardboard VR games/ experiences and games for Vive and Oculus. Some of the other examples that were impactful in my research are Invasion and Aperture Robot Repair. They demonstarted a great VR user experience when the feeling of presents is imminent, as well as the connection with virtual creatures feels incredibly real (the feeling that the robot is coming directly onto the player wherever player moves, was achieved through the VR space size and VR environment behaviours that make the player move in certain directions) – in Aperture Robot. Similarly, in Invision the cute bunny is sniffing and looking directly into the face of player, which creates the feeling of being present in VR and communicating with this bunny.
Among the other details I considered is psychological comfort and feeling of safety, which would include the personal space bubble and other relevant functionalities. To avoid bad behaviours in VR, I considered having a verbal code of conduct that everyone should agree on when enetering the virtual world. It would be accessible as a set of rules in writing as well, for everyone with limited hearing abilities or when playing without sound.
The next step is creating more detailed 3D prototypes and to test with people from TA. It includes some 3D Art, which I started working on during the 3D layout tests.
I started working on 3D elements, first of all, on the avatar. Before starting to work on the dog avatar, I made an avatar research for animals and humans. I looked into games such as Spore, Project Spark, Minecraft (and Animal Daycare Roleplay), The Sims 3 Pets, Dog Sim Online – Robot Dogs, Animal Jam, The Lab (Vive Game) – its dog-like character you can play with, Farlands (Oculus), and other animal-related games I mentioned earlier, for animal/ creature characters types and customization.
For the way of human character introduction and customization I checked Sims, Star Trek Online, GTA 5 Online, Black Desert Online, Aion, Fallout 3 and 4, and some other. As well, " The Secret Life of Pets" showed very creative characters and behaviours. I gathered a lot of insights on the in-game creation process and the look and started working on the characters. My research included Facebook's avatar creation process and findings. Below is a draft example of a dog – one of the types (made in Blender, in progress).
Working on 3D I apply the "Lean" approach of testing and iteration to ensure the models have the right look for TA, evoke the right feelings and work well in terms of function (rigged and animated well). For the final files the following should be met:
Convex mesh with 255 polygons max. (assuming these object will collide)
Keep it in quads
Ensure the meshes are planar
"Lean" construction, rigging and animation processes (start simple, test soon, iterate quickly and repeat)
To be more confident in the design solutions, make the right business and user focused decisions, and secure longevity of vision, I started working more precise on the mental models following the Methodology by Indie Young: "Mental Models. Aligning Design Strategy with Human Behavior".
Mental models are a large part of what holds many people back from VR at the moment, as uncovered through my previous research and can be found here: What people do when placed in VR and here: How people use certain VR apps, their feelings and thoughts (New vs. Experiensed users).
I am concentrated on knowing more of the type of experience described above (social, pets), knowing what people expect from such VR experience, how they feel about it, to understand better what behaviours and interactions to create, how to make the existing designs and structure better, what other possible types of VR experience are desired.
Another big point on my work is empathy. Not only concerning the pet situation, but in a big part concerning VR experiences and HMDs, their usability and comfort. Creating with an empathy with a New Inexperienced VR User. I talked to people, observed and looked if patterns appear, also watched the vocabulary people use and worked on uncovering their perspective concerning VR.
As well, it's planned to regularly test the small parts of the prototype, UI, characters, to observe and learn about people using it.
In progres. This case study will be peroidically updated along the way of design and development. Please contact me if you'd like to know more.
Based on my reasearch and observations, as well as games’ tests for vlog, and on some additional resources, I created VR Heuristic Evaluation. It’s a check list that helps to make sure the major VR heuristics are followed. It’s not a set of concrete rules, but a flexible guide which everyone can apply depending on the experience being tested. Planned to be an online tool, will be implemented on a new website. It will be iterated along the way. Below is the first iteration, available to Download
The other material that currently is being worked on is VR Lingua – a VR Dictionary. Along the way, from my very first days in VR until now were accumulated over 100+ pages of VR terms with definitions and links, which I first was collecting for my own convenience. Then when the amount of pages started nearing 100, I decided that it could be a useful material to share with people who start exploring virtual reality.
Considering the amount of material, card sorting isn't convenient for categories' testing, and it was decided to put it online and encourage people to leave feedback if they think it belongs to the other category or if the whole idea with grouping doesn't seem convenient. Currently, the terms are grouped in several categories, with an option to vew words alphabetically. VR Lingua will be located on VR Oxygen's new website. The full version is currently available in pdf. The VR Lingua will have some educational aspect which I'm not documenting here yet, but there will be a method to check the knowledge in a fun way. Contact me if you'd like to know more.
VR Oxygen strives to provide all the essential tools needed to start exploring VR, with an approach to show what good VR is and to introduce it in a right way.
Exploration and initial research showed that people were really interested in buying VR Cardboards (end of 2015-begin of 2016):
At various VR expos people approached and asked where they can buy a cardboard
People liked the cardboard giving away that I held at some events, asked if they could buy
DK2 lenses were close to Google Cardboard lenses (lenses were checked using the resolution plate test), but the cost was much higher + it had wires and required a set up (main concerns of people I surveyd)
iPhone and Android people are growing globally, money spent on mobile gaming increased
The information gathered from several research organizations was positive about cardboard usage and distribution in the end of 2015
Based on the above findings and observations it was decided to choose mobile VR as an initial platform and select the first product – Cardboard VR Viewer.
People ages 13-18, casual gamers, mobile gamers and their parents
Young adults (18-35) that are interested in new technology
Educational organizations (Schools, Museums)
Vague understanding of the VR adoption, mass market interest, marketing ways
People have no clear idea of what a good VR is because of the huge amount of low-quality VR Cardboards
Understand the mass market interest, marketing ways, people’s assumptions about VR
Understand the VR adoption stage
Help the VR community grow, show the good VR, instroduce VR as a tool to share the experience
Establish the VR Oxygen brand, show its values and goals
Create a company, set up e-commerce, getc.ustomers, sales
Explore VR distribution channels
Product discovery, market and user research, competitive analysis
User Exploration: Guerrilla Research, Interviews (at VR events; expos)
Manufacturing processes, tools and materials research
Lenses tests from 6 different cardboards using Resolution Test Targets (RTT), compare results, analyze
Research optics companies, get information about the materials and specs, get quotes for chosen materials and lens types
Purchase sample lenses with different selected characteristics (where available), test them with RTT, compare, evaluate price vs. quality, establish the maximum, limiting quality that makes sense to aim for (as assumed – after crossing some level of parameters the lens is wasting those parameters anyway because the eye can’t pick up any more detail. – Confirmed).
Other vendors and manufacturers research and estimates
2. Evaluation and Manufacturing
Obtaining/ buying samples from manufacturers
Vendor and manufacturer vetting
First customers acquisition, publications and sales (Kickstarter)
First batch manufacturing
Fullfillment research, vetting, set up
Demos at several expos, surveys, interviews, observations
All the RTT evaluations and work related to optics were done by an Optical Physicist
To understand what is happening in the market, what is the quality of these products and if there are any flaws, I conducted competitive analysis. As well as to understand how the VR viewers product websites are structured, what is the buying experience for the people. To figure out how to make cardboard market better, and what form VR Oxygen website should take.
Process: some time was spent testing cardboards with Resolution Test Targets and exploring websites of several selected companies. It was possible to identify what each did well, and what each could improve.
Based on in-person tests and interviews the following assumptions were made:
Educating people on the quality of VR viewer will make them more aware and informed, which would influence sales positively.
Showing the research and test results will show that VR Oxygen is a reliable and trusted company.
Creating an oil-resistant coating and overall comfortable viewer will make people more confident in sharing their viewer without being embarassed.
The competitive analysis was very helpful in determining a gap and deciding on a feature list for the viewer (oil resistant coating + soft nose piece, color), as well as for the future website – to create a seamless experience: get a viewer – get an experience, and while waiting for delivery – watch these games online, select and download the games to play.
Several samples were manufactured to see the production quality and to evaluate the features. Next – the first batch production.
Some of the discoveries were made thanks to the pitfalls and failures of the first batch manufacturing: part of the viewers was considered defective due to the wrong lenses. Despite this, it was decided to test both, the first and the second batch viewers as well as some of the previous samples of various quality were added to observe and compare people's reaction.
people didn’t know that the viewers were different in quality. The participants were aged 9-35. Initial results were mapped and split in groups based on age, New users and Experienced users. Research was done at a 2 day-long expo/ fair. The test results and discoveries are below:
7 of 10 Experienced users aged 9-35 had a very bad first VR experience (low quality lenses, wrong ipd, wrong cardboard box) even though they stil liked it.
8 of 10 Experienced users showed they were completely unaware how to identify the quality of a viewer and what is a good VR Cardboard. People's behaviours and reactions indicated that their previous VR experience was extremely poor in quality. It was a big discovery.
Conclusion followed: Market is flooded with very low quality cardboards and most of people are unaware of it. People either thought all cardboards were like this sample and it’s impossible to have a better quality, or thought the good viewers are only produced by Google.
After these results it was decided to purchase more of various cardboard viewers from different companies, the viewers and companioes were selected randomly and from the funnels that TA would use (amazon, e-bay and directly from some companies, all of them were very cheap in price. After tests with the Resolution Test Tragets it was revealed that ALL of them were made not up to Google’s standards even though claiming they were. Resolution: At least 90% of the VR Cardboard market or more is flooded with low quality viewers.
This, on one side, made VR Oxygen as one of the relatively few up to specs manufacturers, on the other hand, if the majority of people has an initially wrong impression it’s a very uneasy task for a small company to reassure them. Younger audience (9-18) was much more tolerant in their judgments and mostly extremely positive even with the defective viewer tests.
9 of 10 New users aged 5-18 have found VR very interesting, exciting and immersive.
10 of 10 New users aged 8-22 intuitively knew how to use it.
7 of 10 Experienced users thought it’s very easy to buy lenses and make a good VR viewer (which is true in theory, but barely possible in reality. Same quality lenses as by Google specs per pair cost is much higher than expected by people). Lenses sold through regular funnels for aound $2 are low quality lenses with wrong focal length or other defects like low resolution (lp/mm) and a low surface quality – much below Lambda/4 (100% of lenses bought through usual channels were of this quality).
8 of 10 New users thought the current price is very low price for such product and would buy for higher price.
6 of 10 Experienced users thought it’s actually a very cheap product and very easy to manufacture – cheaper than it’s actually is in a wholesale price and manufacturing price for large quantities.
Interesting finding: An OPPOSITE thinking = New users vs. Experienced users.
Another very curious discovery: All people (mostly, experienced users) thought that "Google Cradboard" is a common noun (common nouns name general items, for example: a chair, a table, a dog, ...a google cardboard). People thought what they tried was a Google Cradboard too. Noone refered to this type of viewer as a "cardboard" or as any other name, only "Google Cardboard".
Knowing that I will communicate with people of very different age groups (children) and abilities, I reviewed the Ethical Guidelines before the events to make sure I comply with all the possible situations.
User observations validated the assumptions about the oil resistant coating, soft nose piece and quality in general. When comparing, all people noticed that uncoated viewers were getting greasy and unpleasant, favoriting the VR Oxygen viewers with oil-resistant coating and a soft nose piece.
As well, the demand and willingness to buy the Cardboard viewers were validated. All viewers were usually sold out during the events/ expos.
The following problems were found:
ALL people wanted to find content easily and fast – right after purchasing the viewer expected to immediately get a VR games source.
Market is flooded with super low quality cardboards, both lenses and box manufacturing.
Hard to make a right choice of VR Cardboard, too few info shown on the websites: no brand shows details on the lenses, the only shown are FOV, diameter, optical surface curvature (biconvex) which don't indicate a quality of the lens.
It was both, a Strategic research – to get a better picture of people who use this product, and a Tactical Research – to understand what to build next (such as vlog as the results showed).
Everyone in the photo was asked for agreement/disagreement to post the photos and was explained the purpose of it. All the participants listed in the photos gave their permission to use their photos.
Kickstarter was used as an inital platform to acquire customers and to gain visibility through publications, to start conversations with people, prospective customers. It was the first public appearance of VR Oxygen.
The research and preparations for the Kicktarter took approximately 2.5 months. The campaign duration was 28 days, it included promotion, communication with bakers, and all other activities related to the campaign.
Announcing the Kickstarter at VR Mixer-2016 in San Francisco:
Problem arised: The first batch was defective.
Solution and Strategy:
Change the manufacturer and vendors. New evaluation and vetting
Acquire samples, document the details, request assurance and documentation from the new manufacturers
Create a more detailed agreement
Have a quality control stage for each batch
Have a third party between the actual manufacturing factory and VR Oxygen
After all of the above was ready, I decided to continue looking for a new manufacturere due to the following issues that would be present, otherwise:
Lead time almost doubled
All stages and chek ups took too much time
Third iteration on the manufacturing process:
More research and negotiation was done
The issue was fully resolved and the manufacturing in now the US
After working on VR Oxygen brand, establishing philosophy and vision, I developed a Brand Strategy that included a Video Blog, an Index (“Best VR Games for Cardboards”), and a Brand Voice. Vlog is set to work in conjunction with the new product website creating a loop – the vlog is leading to the website and vice versa.
To help people find good VR content easily without spending hours looking for resources and games, or being dissappointed after a bad VR experience, to get a game preview before proceeding to download and play.
After in-person interviews during a fair it was the #1 question of ALL people who bought VR Oxygen viewer – where to get (good) games? Experienced users shared their pains: they couldn't find good content, spent a lot of time searching but were dissapointed when didn't find any good quality games.
First, I added the links to some selected games with short descriptions. During tests it became clear that people want to have more imformation, to preview the game. They also asked which game I would recommend etc. So was born an idean to create a video blog.
To create a better Customer Experience when after purchasing the viewer the customer will have a list of VR games and apps to start with, while waiting for their viewer to be delivered people can start exploring VR games – watch reviewes and decide what they’d like to try next.
To establish brand authority and visibility
To increase online sales
People ages 17-35, casual gamers, mobile gamers (new targets: 13+)
Young adults that are interested in new technologies, YouTube browsers and Reddit people
Current Cardboard VR people
Gaming/ VR companies who are interested in featuring their content on VR Oxygen channel/ getc.onsulting
Hard to find good VR games/ experiences for Cardboard VR. There are many channels, but most show just any or new VR games, not the best or selected ones.
People get introduced to VR in a wrong way, often with low quality apps and viewers. People become desperate in finding experiences they could like and abandone VR as something “not ready”, blurry, glitchy, or only for games.
Establish brand aithority and get more visibility
Become a platform for an easy and fun VR dicovery – only the good quality games
Encourage people to create more of the great VR content and to share their experiences
Help existing games to get better (better UX, UI, comfort etc.) – consult
Attract more people into VR, help growing the user base and community
Increase online sales
Research the popular video blogs, observe the TA and study analytics to understand what does TA watch.
Research and acquire equipment needed to shoot a video blog.
Create and test MVPoC to test the assumptions, see if people will like an idea, see how they react. Start with minimal risk and investments, iterate based on real customer feedback.
Easy access to a good quality VR content together with the cardboard viewer – all in one place
Convenient payment options: credit cards, bitcoin
Games positioned as best, game advertisement (for game studios as customers)
Consultancy and user testing (for game studios)
Increase in online sales, better conversion
Strenghten brand authority and trust
Know the people better – create better products – get more sales and engaged people – get more feedback – know the customers...
Measurement of Success
Online sales increase
Positive reviews, customer engagement – feedback, comments, shares/ retweets (User marketing), mailing list sign-ups
Games proposals (game studios and individual developers)
Subscribers and views count – better ranking
Before publishing the vlog, about 2 months were spent researching the existing popular among the TA vlogs, exploring Youtube tools, vlogging tools (lights, cameras etc). Some time was spent practicing with different equipment and styles. I set a timeline for several months ahead, with tools and techniques to use and test one by one.
To know what type of content about VR TA would like to watch, I conducted a survey with 10 participants.
9 of 10 wanted to see the gameplays of different VR games/ experiences
8 of 10 mentioned they “watch gameplays as movies”
After the series of test and iterations (the vlog was shared with 2 people from TA to get feedback), the vlog was launched. It was decided to shoot in batches (6-8 episodes) in order to accumulate feedback and have an opportunity to improve. First 1.5 months, the episodes were posted twice a week to introduce people to the new channel. A roadmap made specifically for the vlog helped to stay focused on the goals and to keep the deadlines. The milestones are documented below.
a. MVPoC of vlog, covering the fun and best VR games for mobile.
Introduction to the vlog and Nina. Using minimal budget under $100
laptop, background paper, posters, light and stands, 2 umbrellas
duration – 3 weeks
gather first feedback
Below is the Channel Trailer (35 sec.) with some of the first episodes featuring several games.
b. Feedback analysis, adjustments according to the received insights (make longer gameplays, more info about the game itself, bugs, features, make better sound)
MVPoC had a positive outcome (85 subs in 2 mo, likes (approx 8-11 likes per video – high customer engagement, good ratio subs/ likes), comments, e-mails, 3 game studios pitching their games and collaboration proposals).
Next: add gear and inventory for the budget under $400
duration – 1 month
Some of the episodes are below.
c. Feedback analysis, adjustments according to the received insights (adjust sound, mention if button is required)
Gather more feedback from all channels (Youtube, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, e-mails..)
Switch from posting twice a week to once a week
duration – 1.5 month
The episodes are below.
d. Ranking Improvement (analyze statistics and adjust)
– tags (improve tags in all 3)
Get more clear in the niche (mobile VR games for Cardboard)
Received Feedback: add more talk/ opinions during the experience (voice during the game), a more thorough review, some more information about the developers, some technical specs.
Look for trends to plan posts, videos and other materials around these trends
Conduct survey, get feedback – change content based on the results;
Conduct a survey
Add gear for the budget of $1200-$1600 (camera + lens)
duration – 1.5 month
The most recent episodes are below.
Nina – VR Oxygen brand voice. Nina is a good name to keep because it desn’t contain any challenging letters or sounds, is relatively international and easy to pronounce and understand (the name was tested with 10 people from different countries: USA, Canada, Brazil, Spain, Germany, Israel, China, Great Britain, Philippines, Turkey). As well as after a name search no negative meanings were found.
Personality: Nina is vlogging, tweeting, facebooking, using other social media for communications on the brand’s behalf, she embodies VR Oxygen. Nina likes exploring new, based on her background she can speak about VR.
She appreciates everyone in the community and presents each game in a creative way (her surrounding is related to the game she is talking about), never saying negative about the game and its creators, and always encouraging to explore VR, reminding that all the games she presents are the best, each experience – in its individual way (it was mentioned in a Voxel Fly episode). All the games were thoroughly selected based on different criteria.
Nina is really excited for VR to succeed and to help more people to understand it right. Nina works towards being more similar to the audience at some characteristics, working on iterations along the way, gathering feedback and adjusting.
Nina is bold, fun, likes to experiment. But she is also nice, friendly and humble, she likes helping and wants to make an impact. Those of the character traits capture the evolving nature of the company.
The words that describe the brand/ Nina: essential, creative, experimental, helpful.
The new survey conducted in High Scool with TA unveiled more details and insights on how to improve the vlog for 16-18 y. o. age group. The main findings were about the type of content people were looking for, some of the new findings are below.
What type of content about Virtual Reality would interest you, if at all?
The main findings (in this direction): Learning VR, Games, live VR and 360° videos, news
Dispite the growing amount of proposals from game studios the vlog was “paused” (the content stays same with no iteration to maintain consistency) for the time to finalize reasearch in High School, iterate based on research and feedback, work on a new type of content targeting the new TA (13+) (educational); work on the new website for VR Oxygen, and continue working and experimenting on an actual VR product. The latest episodes are soon to be published. Please contact for details.
Findings: The most productive way to get feedback is to ask right in vlog – people are the most responsive and give feedback to Nina via e-mail. Next – on social media (Reddit, sometimes Twitter), as well people are very responsive. The Google Forms Surveys pinned in the comments, as well as cards and other in-vlog surveys (YouTube tool) are not successful at the moment.
The distance between iterations was usually 6-8 episodes, to gather feedback and check analytics.
1. Thumbnails were tested and replaced as well based on the analysis.
After uploading a variety of styles, the types of Thumbnails that get higher click through rates were discovered (those that look like a CTA button among other content, Thumbnails containing bright solid color with minimal details, geometrically clear, faces with strong emotions)
2. Tags and keywords research (Google, Google AdWords Keyword Tool). 3. Gradually increasing quality (content and video)
4. Tested different length of the videos (keeping the videos around 8-12 min long is ideal (or at least more than 5 min, less than 15).
5. Tested very short videos as well (1 min long)
6. Analytics analysis (who is watching what, when they watch etc.) and more tests and analysis was done.
7. Publishing time and day
The goal is to make content that’s interesting for TA which should be:
– informative (solves problem)
– positive; funny
Below is the vlog production process. It was iterated and changed slightly on the way due to software and equipment change.
After 2 mo. milestone, the YouTube channel started to convert some visitors to customers (checked via analytics – referral links)
Following on Twitter became more stable, the unfollowing rate decreased, following per day doubled (from 3-5 to 10-12 on average per day with 0-1 unfollower). Following is higher when posts are regular
Reddit – upvotes and comments increased dramatically resulting in active communication and feedabck
IGN – likes, feedback and communication increased, new leads to views
Facebook – likes/share per mo increased slightly
YouTube – people became more engaged (more comments, likes, e-mails)
Building trust – month 2 results: positive comments and more engagement
Twitter and Facebook followers started sharing VR Oxygen’s content (some with high following that resulted in retweets and likes)
Proposals to review VR content increased (started at 80 subscribers, which was unexpected. The channgel got more subscribers after those types of reviews, even more content to review, more feedback, more mailing list subscribers, more sales – a visible performance increase compare to "before the vlog").
The vlog links on the company website have a positive impact
Each iteration usually brings more engaged viewers, more proposals and increase in conversion. The work on the vlog is to be continued after a short break for research and new content developments.
VR Oxygen has customers and needs a website that would communicate the brand’s values clearly, show its philosophy and value proposition to different customer categories: casual mobile gamers, buyers, as well as newly gained customers that are involved in game or VR development.
I practiced various types of research to find the best solution for the found problems and needs. This research as well influenced vlog iterations. I utilized the following:
Guerrilla Research (analytics, heatmap);
Competitive analysis (product websites);
Surveys and user Interviews;
Observation (expos, University, schools)
Quantitive and Qualitative Research from Greenlight VR, Dubit Research “Kids and VR”, Order Dynamic Whitepaper and other available resouces that allowed to see analytics and metrics
To be a hub for everyone who wants to try VR or who is looking for good VR content. A place where people can easily find everything they need – a viewer and games, affordable VR. A seamless experience – get a viewer – get an experience, and while waiting – watch these games online. No need to waste time searching for VR content.
People ages 13-18, casual gamers, mobile gamers and their parents
Young adults (18-35) that are interested in new technology, casually and professionally
Educational organizations (Schools, Museums)
Needs to clearly express brand’s philosophy and value proposition.
The content that VR Oxygen produces changed much from the first time the website was launched, thus, the website needs an Evolutionary Redesign based on the new and prospective content and a newly discovered goals and needs of TA.
Wesite is too crowded with content and code, loads slowly.
Keep people on website longer to explore more content (convert), flow from one to another.
People abandon cart due to uncomfortable and confusing experience.
Create a comfortable, easy to undertand and use website experience for New users and increase: views on Youtube channel, conversion, subscriptions (+ sign up conversion rate – secondary)
Create appropriate content: imagery, texts, titles; write a clean code to load fast
Generate more leads from YouTube and social media
Create a mobile/ iPad/ desktop website, an easy to use and convenient cart with a minimum of equired fields (better UX for cart)
To evaluate the current product – the manufactured viewers, to discover people pain points that were not seen earlier, and to get insights about the ways to improve, to test the current website, were conducted short interviews with 20 expo visitors, 10 more people were surveyed.
I came up with an idea to test the cart with New users: VR Oxygen had a Sale event during the Maker Fair expo where visitors could get a discount only if bought online by certain time meaning that most of the people had to buy it right at the event. It was a great opportunity to observe people using the website and cart in front of me, all the major issues became obvious (people asked questions).
VR Oxygen was invited to University to give a talk about Virtual Reality, it was a one more great opportunity to test the viewers, the website and cart with the TA, because several students started buying the viewers right in class and asked questions.
How do people navigate the website (not all people scrolled, some did scroll because didn't notice how to buy)
How easily do people understand how to buy a viewer (cart has some UX issues, it's currently a standard template from the 3-rd party software)
What do people do or try to do after purchasing a product (looking for games)
People’s answers, reactions and expectation gave great insights about the possible improvements (What to play? Where can I get the games? Do you also make games? etc.)
To understand how people feel, I asked the following questions:
Do you like the look-and-feel? (The answers varied, but most participants did like the look)
Do you understand the product’s value proposition? (not everyone understood)
Google Analytics showed:
How do people move through the site
If behaviours vary between devices, locations or demographics (greately varies by day – weekday or holiday/ weekend)
The hitmap (ClickTale) showed that people don’t scroll and that they might be unsure where to click to uy the viewer.
Even though it was clear that the website needs redesign, the tests hepled to understand better:
That CTAs were not always effective
People didn't usually scroll
Insights into what people are aiming for (better cart, and access to good quality VR experiences)
User reasearch also helped to understand the vocabulary that people use and can understand, it will affect navigation and category labelling.
More problems found on the website when tested with another group of people at the University:
2/5 disliked the landing page
2/5 asked if there are reviews or any more information about the veiewer
3/5 couldn’t understand how to buy the cardboard
4/5 couldn’t understand what’s special with VR Oxygen viewers
As usual, all the data was documented to evaluate in the future
Based on the research results the following assumptions were made:
Creating a landing page with clearly stated values and options, choosing the right content relative to TA and company values will help to keep people on the website longer and to convert them to customers, because it would build trust and authority, engage and help in finding useful content.
The right visual content (concise, sharp, visually rich, on topic, use video) will help to engage with TA.
Adding reviews will help to gain more trust (ask the real VR Oxygen Cardboard people to write testimonials).
Add the product and company story, so people will form the right impression and keep being engaged.
Creating a custom cart with UX developed for customer needs will result in higher number of sales and lead to increase of vlog views.
Adding the product manufacturing details (lenses details and photos), production process pictures – demonstrating transparency – will help to build trust as well as the information will educate customers on the product in general (how to select a good Cardboard VR viewer).
Making CTA more prominent and locating it in the stronger click through place (following Gutenberg diagram if on desktop, centered - for mobile) will result in higher conversions and increase the time spent on the website.
Show the quality, educate people on the product, be transparent about all processes (show lenses comparison, tell a story about how they are manufactured etc.)
Give people good quality, selected content, create a flow that supports vlog engagement and game downloads.
Create a comfortable checkout experience.
How might we...
Improve website appearance and functionality for people and business success rates (conversion, subscribers, engagement, feedback, higher quality game proposals).
Increase subscribers count and views, shares (User marketing), customer engagement.
Collaborate with schools, colleges, Universities, museums and other educational organizations.
Become a hub for all the great VR content in 1 place.
Based on the research I developed several personas showing people’s behaviors, needs, goals and motivations, problems and mental models. It was critical to establish the right TA in order to create the right customer experience. As well, content creation (now – vlog) heavily relies on Personas.
The research also included materials from:
Greenlight VR research
Dubit Research “Kids and VR” Qualitative Research
Order Dynamic Whitepaper and other resources
When analyzing my research and interviews, I decided to group all the information by commonalities, creating an affinity maps.
All the discoveries were sorted out into 4 Personas:
World Changer, Co-Pilot, VR Buyer and VR Discoverer. An affinity mapping process for the World Changer Persona is on the picture below:
Later, after moving to the other social media as a main sharing source for video blog, one more Persona was discovered – VR Enthusiast:
After more research and interviews, it became clear that Co-Pilot and VR Buyer have more similarities and can be merged into one Persona:
When VR Oxygen started getting proposals from game studios and finding similarities, one more Persona was formed – Game Studio:
As a result, the current Personas are: World Changer, VR Buyer, VR Discoverer, VR Enthusiast, Game Studio. Assuming that VR Discoverer and VR Enthusiast may merge in the future, but for now decided to keep them separatly due to various differences in behavior. Personas research and adjustments to be continued.
To better understand the mental models of the people, to discover how people understand and conceptualize the information and where they expect to find it, I run a card sorting.
1. Website structure and navigation, content structure (expos, in-person). 15 participant took part at the workshop, where they sorted all the content of the website into groups, then they titled these groups.
2. Similar task was done to categorize game types and genres – with 10 people via Optimal Workshop and 5 people during an in-person moderated card sort.
The list of genres and types was created beforehand after reasearching the existing VR content distribution platforms, as well as brainstorming based on the customer reaserch and discovered needs. Type (e.g., 360° video, animated film...), category (e.g., education, travel...), genre (e.g., action, simulation...). During the session the participnts could remove some of the cards. Most of the people guessed that categories such as travel, education..., are common throughout the variety of diferent types and genres, and sorted types and genres.
Based on the results – the way people sorted the cards, the follwoing 3 categories were created for games/ experiences section: Gaming, Non-Gaming and All.
Next, I decided to get more precise results in defining the games’ genres and categories, but it’s much more complicated to accomplish because to title the gameplay requires watching a gameplay or reading about it, so it was decided to offer a reward for this type of test. Participants must understand most of the content (– to be conducted). It’s planned to keep testing and to do more card sorting later on the way to validate the labelling for particular games (that are unlabelled by the developer).
3. Next, I made a study to uncover the details the people would like to know when they are looking for the game. To establish which information people consider to be the most important about all VR experiences, I created cards with different information such as “button: required or not”, “size”, “gameplay duration”, “frame rate”, “3D art” etc., and had participants rank them according to how important they consider them to be. People sorted them into the following groups (closed card sorting, conducted online via Optimal Workshop):
– very important
– somewhat important
– not important
The game genres card sorting excersice helped to understand what information to include into each game description, such as: genre (shooter, adventure...), input (button, none), navigation/ UI, platform (Android, iOS), price, system requirements.
Card sorting showed that most New users grouped games differently from the Experienced users due to different language. Similar to the previous tasks, this card sorting is to be contunued and iterated.
Based on Scenarios I created a user flow for each Persona. After several iterations and shaffling the user flows were developed, they were then overlapped to see the full picture of interactions.
Tree Testing (IA)
To test the structure of the website and to understand if the content is grouped logically to people I conducted Tree Testing. After creating the website navigation model the tasks for potential customers were written, people would have to complete them within the designed navigation.
This type of excersise was good to test scenarios and to see if people can find the requested information within the designed structure. The tree was tested with 10 people from TA via Optimal Workshop. I tested 3 tasks per session and had 3 rounds of studies with each customer to test all 9 tasks (remote study).
The analysis of the test was concentrated on the following questions:
If people were able to find the content: how many people got it right, how many people got it wrong
How long did it take people to complete the task
The paths people took, and whether or not they had to click back up the tree
Where did the people expect the content to be located
Where did the people go first
In order to simplify the collaboration with a developer and to create a document containing a full set of interactions, I started developing the Use Cases describing HOW people will perform tasks on the website. An example is below:
Use case 1. Buying Cardboard VR Viewer (for Bitcoins)
Customer – World Changer (Alex)
Preconditions: Going home from school.
Trigger: Alex received a message with the link to VR viewer.
1. Customer enters the VR Oxygen website
2. iPhone loads the landing page
3. Customer chooses VR Viewer section and proceeds to the page
4. iPhone delivers the VR Viewer page
5. On the page customer checks the photos of the viewer by swiping left or by clicking on the dots below
6. Customer clicks the BUY button and proceeds to the cart, iPhone delivers the Cart page
7. Customer chooses the quantity they want to buy by tapping on + or -, iPhone changes the quantyty with every tap
8. Customer clicks on the Next button and if there are no errors, proceeds to the Shipping address screen. iPhone delivers the Shipping Address screen
9. Customer types in their desired shipping address, when done with the shipping address customer clicks next and if there are no errors with this screen customer proceeds to the Shipping Method
OR If there are errors – incorrectly entered zip – gets error message – updates info – proceeds
10. Customer chooses to pay using bitcoins and proceeds further by clicking the Next button
11. (depending on the merchant an method - wallet, QR scan or input)
12. Customer proceeds to confirm everything, iPhone delivers the Confirmation screen
13. Customer can check the item (cardboard VR Viewer), quantity, shipping address, payment method, tax and the total amount. Everything is correct and customer pushes “Place Order” button. Payment is withdrawn (process started), e-mail to the customer is being sent to the address they provided
14. iPhone delivers Thank you screen telling that a confrmation e-mail has been sent to an e-mail Alex has provided an offers to explore VR games and experience
Ideation, Creation, Design
The design process was organized based on Design Thinking techniques and Google Venture Design Sprint excersises. Brainstorming and mind mapping, 8 ideas in 5 min, 1 big idea in 5 min, 1 storyboard in 5 min and in 20 min, How might we... techniques were used to generate as many ideas as possible. Each excercise helped to find new paths to dicover.
Understand and Define
First, I decided one more time to go through the research and pinpoint the insights about the type of information to use, both, content and visual (derived from the research stage) such as: bursts of info, short and consice content, video, pictures as instructions, less text everywhere, simplify, get or watch an experience in 3 clicks, getc.ardboard in 2-3 clicks (proceed to buy in 1 click) etc. I underlined the main customer needs and pains and aligned them with VR Oxygen goals.
Diverge and Decide
The main journey was drafted based on the insights from previous stage. Below are some of the excercises I practiced:
Next, all the ideas were reviewed, analyzed and 2 ideas were selected to test: "Split screen idea" and "video on screen". Being on a budget required me to think about the customer value versus techical difficulty – what is really worth creating that people really need. I always kept it in mind and made decisions balancing customer needs, business goals and available budget.
Prototype, Mockups, Prototype
The first prototypes were low fidelity paper sketches, the next one was made in inVision based on the wireframes I drafted in Sketch. I tested the screens and flow, navigation and the amount of content.
After testing the paper and rough inVision prototype I started refining the designs, determining what content should be available on each page, working on the layout and interactions for each page type more precisely.
To evaluate the design and content I conducted usability studies, some tests are currently in progress.
Usability Studies with TA based on Personas:
2 rounds of studies with 5 prticipants per round. A phase of the product development and goals were considered when making a choice among research methodologies.
Heuristic Evaluation (Based on J. Nielsen Heuristics List and ISO 9241 Ergonomics of HCI, Part 110: Dialogue principles)
Visual Affordance Testing to make sure CTA and other elements (menu, cards) are recognized
Walktrough and Behavioral test – interviews
Tasks completion/ Think aloud test (based on scenarios) – interviews (done; more tests in progress)
A/B Test the buttons on the landing page to see which buttons do people push more often to reorganize the layout if needed; Optimizeley
Contunue tracking the custom click events (Google Analytics). Track game downloads, video plays, VR Design Materials, may be use for conversion tracking.
Reviews – people would like to have more reviews, asked where are these reviews from (marketplace)
(4 of 5 people)
Suggested solution: replace reviews by stories from real customers and let people share their stories right on the website (not instantly since it would require permanent website moderation. People will be able to submit their stories and get published after the stories are reviewed).
People wanted to go to VR experience from VR viewer screens easily and fast (4 of 5 people)
Suggested solution: dropdown VR experience/ VR viewer
Some people thought the VR experience is an experience made by VR Oxygen. (2 of 5 people) Even though they liked the possibility to have a list of selected VR experiences, should make it clear that there are selected VR Experiences from various game companies or solo developers.
Suggested solution: provide a short description, list the game company.
People asked what type of VR is it (e.g., mobile or Oculus) (2 of 5 people)
Suggested solution: make clear that it’s mobile VR, provide description/ title.
Merge Product story, manufacturing details in one story to make the information more compact.
People had no problem finding CTA on the landing page (5 of 5 people)
People could find how to buy a viewer with no problems (5 of 5 people)
People have found games and the vlog game review videos very inetersting, engaging and unusual as “pice of art” (as some said). They also enjoyed browsing through the experience section and checking out the thumbnails (5 of 5 people)
People could successfully finish the given tasks (5 of 5 people)
People knew what to expect from the VR Experience section (either buy or watch an experience) (5 of 5 people)
People always knew where they were (5 of 5 people)
People could understand that they can buy a VR viewer on the website as well as get or watch VR experiences (5 of 5 people)
People could understand how many steps it would take to buy a viewer (cart) (how many steps to go, how many steps are done) (5 of 5 people).
People could understand they can share the cards (and they liked it!) (5 of 5 people)
People liked the experience overall and mentioned that they’ve tried to search for something on different VR companys website and the website was inconvenient to use, people liked that VR Oxygen website is made specifically for the phone (2 of 5 people mentioned exactly that)
Make A and iOS current state more prominent
Call to Action on cards was clear, but people tend to click on the whole card on Stories (3 of 5 people)
Suggested solution: change the color of the white card, make the whole card clickable. Modify the button so it’s clear it contains more info to read.
VR Oxygen logo was interpreted by people as a home button (5 of 5 people)
Purchasing procedure is clear and simple, people had no problem with it (5 of 5)
Customers could cancel an order easily (5 of 5)
For this stage of prototyping I switched to Origami Studio to create more detailed interactions. The following stage will be preparing the final prototype to test one more time with TA and to use it for development.
While designing and testing the new website, the new research and vlog series were started. After the analysis it was clear that the new series had a positive impact and people are interested in reading/ watching more of such materials. Thus, it was decided to add a new category to the website: VR Design Materials. It lead to the landing page restructuring.
More tests were conducted to reveal the hidden issues. The following changes were made:
The search icon was removed and the cart was placed in the App section as well making the navbar identical to the other sections for more consistency.
All the sections are now located on the navbar to make all the content accessible from any location on the website.
Changed the color of Android and Apple logos to white, which as well promotes consistency (all icons are white now).
The navbar was removed from the landing page to avoid the possible distraction and concentrate on the buttons and CTA.
The Viewer/ Apps are now replaced with a viewer picture and Android/ iOS logos. It as well helps with consistency – all sections are represented by icons, and makes navbar less crowded. Icons as well act as a more natural visual cue for VR Oxygen's TA than text (validated by research. See Research section for details).
Changed the stories card to follow the same card template as other cards – with the picture on top and text on the overlay above the photo, for consistency. As well, the photo was changed representing now 3 people instead of one. It's intended to promote unity, friendship and equality. And looks more as a community rather than just cold reviews.
Eliminated "back to home" button replacing it with the new "VR Design Materials section", because there is no more need to go to home to proceed to the other section.
The Buttons on the landing page are located based on the Thumb Zone which provides the natural flow and can impact where people click first. (It helps the dexterity when using 1 hand). I created 2 versions to test: with the Viewer button in the middle and on the bottom. As well, the buttons are now much larger which increases the discoverability and simplifies the expected click action.
Based on the Thumb Zone I as well flipped the Android and Apple buttons, making Android easier to reach.
The button priorities are selected based on the VR Oxygen business goals the most used device (Android) which was discovered via analytics.
Priority #1: VR Viewer,
Priority #2: Android section that has a FAB to video blog which, in its turn, has leads back to the website and cardboard VR Viewer. So it's looped.
The Cardboard Viewer button as well separates the entertainment (bottom buttons) and design/ learn content (top buttons).
Locating all the sections' buttona on the landing page helped to avoid the confusion when people guessed what type of VR it is about. Having Android and Apple logos, as well as a cardboard viewer picture on the landing page provides an immediate explanation that it's mobile VR.
The "Feedback" and "Subscribe to the Mailing list" have a new design and are more spaced out to make them more prominent and separate from the main content.
Decided to keep a share button on the main card as an icon – on the left from BUY CTA (Cardboard section). Having "share" as text distracted people from the main action and they were more slow on proceeding to buy, spending time (even though a short amount) reading the button. Icons have much better readability. This way, the main accent is on the BUY word, defined by it's location and style difference – a short text button that catches the attention.
The tab design of the Game/Experience section (Android/ iOS) is flexible if the new research shows that the labelling should be changed and more than 3 labels are needed. In this case the tab sections will be crollable.
The new prototype is planned to be tested in July at the expo where VR Oxygen will hold a workshop. Among several things to be tested are:
The landing page and CTA buttons, check where people would click first and why.
Check the buttons' position and colors – A/B test 2 different landing pages.
Check if people are confused by the "VR Design Materials" section location – on the top left on the navbar. It previously led to home page, as well as natuarally the "back to home" button is located on this place.
Check if people understand what the red Floating Action Button is (to watch the review on YouTube).
Check affordances: if the CTA button style on the screens and cards (full device width, different from the native Material Design style) is intuitive for people, if they understand immediately that it is a button.
Test if the Info line with the Bulk Option pop-up is perceieved as clickable.
Test if the social buttons on the Android Apps cards are comfortable to reach. Consider flipping them for better thumb reach.
Test navigation tab location (menu, cart, iOS....) and determine if it's better to move it to the bottom or keep on top (based on affordances) – understand how frequently it is supposed to be clicked.
Below are some of the screens and some viewes of the prototype (more detailed interactions to be added after this test is completed). The next stage before the development will be completing the prototype by adding detailed interactions such as Ripple and card transitions to each element accordingly, and iterate based on the test.
The viewers and website were validated with the University students, it was during the early stage of website design, the results confirmed the TA and the main ideas such as offering a VR experience together with the viewer (vlog + on the website), offer bitcoin payment. I watched students' interactions with the prototype and took notes. Among the positive signs were:
Some students have bought viewers right after the tests and started using the website immediately (the current version), some as well subscribed to YouTube.
VR Oxygen has real users of both, a viewer and a vlog + some of the people signed up to mailing list as well and are expecting a new product (an actual VR experience or tool) from VR Oxygen, and are communicating actively.
The other success signs are:
People (subscribers) started retweeting and showing the viewer to others more actively – marketing for VR Oxygen.
VR Oxygen channel was referred by several VR game studios to the other studios.
The latest video dedictaed to VR Heurostics gained new users and views a bit faster than previous videos, as well as received positive comments and retweets. This new direction will be continued.
Currently, the vlog is not published weekly due to the VR design and development, but it's active and will upload new content on a regular, less frequent basis. Please, contact if you'd like to know more.
To Do: continue gathering feedback, conducting surveys (every 2-3 months via vlog) and interviews (in-person interviews); test and finish designs for tablet and desktop, replace the "How to Use" photo with a "hero shot" with the composition following the direction of the CTA (desktop version). Create assets and a blueprint for the development, create a final prototype with detailed interactions such as touch ripples and Material Design transitions for cards (curved trajectory, card zoom, notification pop-up etc.). Below is an example of the touch ripple for buttons.
Some of the performans indicators that were meaningful to watch. Combined metrics:
Sales revenue. After the start of the video blog there were more sales than before, leads are he visitors came from the referral links – video blog had a positive influence to sales and company authority (the expenses assosiated with the vlog and the amount of time spent – all was considered when measuring the effectiveness).
Cost of customer acquisition.
Some conclusions were made after trying the Facebook ads. For now, it's decided to not use any of the ads.
When checked the accumulated statistics over time it’s obvious that the overall outcome of the vlog and social media activities was positive.
Product performance (manufacturer quality control).
As it was established earlier, each batch is now carefully checked and all the documents are prepared in advance with necessary details
Units per transaction.
It was an interesting finding that more than 1/3 of people bought 2 viewers per purchase.
* The work is in progress. More hypotheses are to be tested and validated.
Product selection and brand strategy; Design Sprint; Product Management; IxD/ UX; Visual Design/ UI/Illustration/ 3D; VR storyboarding, VR prototyping, VR Design; Sound Recording/ Editing; Video Recording/ Editing; Brand Strategy; Usability Studies; vendor research, vetting and communication; manufacturing set up; manufacturing management and communication; legal communications and contract writing/ assurance; outsourcing (for urgent tasks); Web Analytics and YouTube Tools; Financial Planning; Crowdfunding campaigns (Kickstarter)
© 2017 Ol-iva